When undertaking excavation for construction projects, proper support systems are essential to ensure the stability of the site and to minimize potential risks associated with soil movement, water infiltration, and structural collapse. This guide outlines several common excavation support methods, highlighting their advantages, disadvantages, and suitable applications.
1. Slope Excavation
Advantages:
-
Low cost and rapid construction progress.
Disadvantages:
-
Large volume of backfill required; prone to local collapse during rainy seasons.
Applications:
-
Suitable for open sites with good soil conditions and no nearby critical infrastructure or underground utilities. If the slope height exceeds 5 meters, a stepped slope is recommended.
Key Considerations:
-
Maximize slope angle where possible, especially in soft soil areas, to improve stability. Ensure proper drainage and water diversion measures are in place to minimize the risks of erosion and collapse. A wire mesh can often replace reinforced steel mesh, and stone powder can substitute for sand and stone in shotcrete applications.
2. Soil Nail Wall (Reinforced Soil Nail Wall)
Advantages:
-
Stable, reliable, and cost-effective. Highly recommended in areas with favorable soil conditions.
Disadvantages:
-
Difficult to implement in poor soil conditions. Requires layered excavation and may demand considerable equipment on sites with tight timelines.
Applications:
-
Ideal for shallow excavations in areas with stable soil.
Key Considerations:
-
For sites near sensitive structures or roads, or for deeper excavations, consider adding prestressed anchors or tiebacks, forming a reinforced soil nail wall. If soft soil layers or backfill material are present, steel mesh nails should be replaced with steel-cased soil nails.
3. Composite Soil Nail Wall (Reinforced Composite Soil Nail Wall)
Advantages:
-
Offers both soil retention and waterproofing capabilities. Typically efficient and cost-effective, where no supporting structures are needed in the pit.
Disadvantages:
-
Longer construction timelines are required due to the need for mixing or jet grouting piles to achieve strength before excavation can proceed.
Applications:
-
Used in areas with soft soils, backfill, or locations where vertical excavation is required due to space constraints.
Key Considerations:
-
For deep excavations, use overlapping piles and incorporate steel pipes or sections to enhance tensile strength. For narrow zones where pile-driving machinery cannot access, high-pressure jet grouting can be an effective alternative. Reinforced composite soil nail walls may require prestressed anchors for deformation control, especially near sensitive environments.
4. Larsen Steel Sheet Piles
Advantages:
-
Excellent durability, high potential for reuse, and short construction times.
Disadvantages:
-
Ineffective against fine particles in water and soil; requires water or dewatering measures in high groundwater areas. Weak in resisting bending, causing potential deformation post-excavation.
Applications:
-
Best suited for shallow excavations (less than 4 meters deep). For deeper pits, internal bracing is recommended.
Key Considerations:
-
For deeper excavations, ensure the sheet piles penetrate stable soil layers. If this is not feasible, passive soil reinforcement measures should be considered.
5. Bored Piles and Anchor Cables (Concrete Internal Bracing)
Advantages:
-
High wall strength and rigidity, providing excellent support, stability, and minimal deformation.
Disadvantages:
-
High cost and longer construction period. Pile gaps may lead to water and soil loss, especially in sandy, high-water-table areas.
Applications:
-
Suitable for deep excavations (8-20 meters) for basement designs. Particularly useful in poor soil conditions.
Key Considerations:
-
Use bored piles in shallow sections near sensitive structures. In areas where groundwater control is difficult, consider adopting an overlapping method to reduce seepage and ensure structural integrity.
6. Gravity Cement Soil Retaining Wall
Advantages:
-
Environmentally friendly with simple construction, no need for anchors or additional bracing, good water resistance, and cost-effective.
Disadvantages:
-
Slow construction progress, as soil mixing piles must reach sufficient strength before excavation. The wall width increases with the depth of the pit, leading to higher costs.
Applications:
-
Best for areas with thick backfill, silt, or clay.
Key Considerations:
-
Ensure piles achieve adequate strength before excavation to prevent collapse. In cases where mixing piles cannot penetrate thick silty layers, additional passive reinforcement may be needed.
7. Diaphragm Wall
Advantages:
-
Provides high stiffness and excellent water resistance, making it the most robust form of excavation support.
Disadvantages:
-
High cost and specialized construction equipment are required. Suitable only for complex and deep excavations.
Applications:
-
Ideal for deep excavations in geologically challenging areas with high surrounding environmental requirements.
8. SMW (Soil Mixing Wall) Method
Advantages:
-
Low noise during construction, minimal environmental impact, and reliable structural strength. Effective at water retention and waterproofing, eliminating the need for additional water barriers.
Disadvantages:
-
Potential for water and sand leakage if the verticality and overlap thickness of the mixing piles are not maintained.
Applications:
-
Suitable for a variety of soil types, including silts, clays, sands, gravel, and pebbles.
Key Considerations:
-
Ensure proper vertical alignment and overlap of mixing piles during construction to avoid leakage. For areas with difficult access, use high-quality H-beams and apply lubricants for ease of recovery.
Conclusion
The choice of excavation support system depends heavily on the specific site conditions, including surrounding environmental factors, excavation depth, geological characteristics, and water table levels. For each project, a combination of these methods may be employed based on the site’s requirements, with safety and cost-efficiency as key considerations. Since excavation support systems are typically temporary structures, it is crucial to ensure that safety is always the top priority throughout the construction process.
